ELACC9-10W1: Write arguments to support claims in an
analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and
sufficient evidence
|
|||||
|
Proficient (100)
|
Meets (80)
|
Emerging (60)
|
Not Evident (40)
|
Not Attempted (0)
|
a. Introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s)
from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that
establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and
evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying
evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in
a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level and concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. Use words, phrases, and clauses to link the major
sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between
claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and
counterclaims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
d. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective
tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which
they are writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows
from and supports the argument presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Communicate 4.2.1 Rubrics Forum
The following is a rubric that I have used to assess ELA standard CCGPSW1, writing expository texts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment